V-SMC: Viswanathan Stochastic Multi-State Cap Table Simulation
The Viswanathan Stochastic Multi-State Cap Table (V-SMC) is a proprietary Monte Carlo simulation framework developed by CA V. Viswanathan for valuing individual tranches of preferred equity in VC-backed startups. Standard valuation methods calculate the value of the entire enterprise — but they fail completely at calculating the precise value of one specific class of shares when that class carries liquidation preferences, anti-dilution ratchets, or sits behind senior venture debt. The V-SMC simulates thousands of probabilistic exit scenarios and runs each through the term sheet's specific legal waterfall to output the risk-adjusted present value of any share class.
V-SMC Interactive Simulator
Series investment (default: ₹10 Cr)
Post-money ownership percentage
Non-participating preference multiplier
Mean expected exit (default: ₹50 Cr)
Lognormal volatility (0.3 = low, 0.6 = high)
Debt cleared before equity distribution
More paths = higher precision, slower compute
The Core Problem: Hidden Value in Term Sheets
When a startup raises a Series A or Series B round, the term sheet contains complex financial instruments that fundamentally alter the risk-return profile of different share classes. These include:
Liquidation Preferences
1x non-participating preferences guarantee investors get their money back before common shareholders see a rupee. In a downside exit, the investor takes their guaranteed return while founders may get zero.
Anti-Dilution Ratchets
Broad-Based Weighted Average anti-dilution provisions dynamically adjust the investor's conversion ratio in down-round scenarios, effectively increasing their equity stake at the expense of existing shareholders.
Senior Venture Debt
Venture debt with senior secured status must be repaid before any equity distribution. This creates a "dead zone" where exit values below the debt amount result in zero equity value for all shareholders.
Standard valuation methods — DCF, Market Multiples, Berkus — calculate the value of the entire enterprise. But they cannot answer the critical question: What is the precise economic value of one share of Series A Preferred versus one share of Founder Common when these complex rights exist?
The V-SMC framework solves this by running thousands of probabilistic exit scenarios through the term sheet's specific legal waterfall, producing a mathematically precise, risk-adjusted value for each share class.
The V-SMC Formula
Deep Variable Definitions
Each variable in the V-SMC formula maps to a specific, observable component of VC deal structure:
| Variable | Name | Definition |
|---|---|---|
| Vseries | True Economic Value | The risk-adjusted present value of the specific Series (e.g., Series A Preferred), accounting for all term sheet protections across the full distribution of possible exits. |
| P(Exiti) | Exit Probability | The probability density of Exit Scenario 'i', simulated via lognormal distribution (geometric Brownian motion) over the expected holding period (typically 5-7 years). Each of N paths represents one equally-weighted possible future. |
| Lpref | Liquidation Preference | The absolute cash value guaranteed to the investor before common equity participates. For a 1x non-participating preference on a ₹10 Cr investment, Lpref = ₹10 Cr. For 1.5x, Lpref = ₹15 Cr. |
| Eshares | Investor Equity Count | The number of shares held by the specific investor class. In the simulation, expressed as a percentage of Tshares (the equity stake). |
| Tshares | Total Outstanding | Total shares outstanding on a fully-diluted basis. Dynamically adjusted within each simulation path for anti-dilution triggers if the simulated exit constitutes a "down round." |
| Ddebt | Senior Venture Debt | Senior secured debt that must be repaid in full before any equity distribution in a liquidity event. Creates a "waterfall floor" below which equity holders receive nothing. |
The Genius of the Max Function
The core mathematical insight of the V-SMC formula is the max() function. It models the investor's binary decision at each simulated exit:
Downside Scenario (Take the Preference)
When the exit value is low, the investor's pro-rata share of equity (after debt) is worth less than their liquidation preference. The rational choice is to take the guaranteed Lpref and walk away.
Investor gets: Lpref | Founders get: Exiti − Ddebt − Lpref
Upside Scenario (Convert to Common)
When the exit value is high, the investor's pro-rata equity share exceeds their preference. The rational choice is to convert to common stock and participate in the upside.
Investor gets: equity share | Founders get: remaining equity
This asymmetric payoff profile means that the economic value of preferred shares is always ≥ the value of common shares on a per-share basis. The V-SMC quantifies this premium precisely by running thousands of scenarios through the max function and averaging the results.
Python Implementation
The following Python implementation demonstrates the V-SMC framework using NumPy for vectorized Monte Carlo simulation. This script can be executed directly to produce the risk-adjusted value of a preferred equity tranche.
Interpreting V-SMC Results
| Metric | What It Tells You | Actionable Insight |
|---|---|---|
| Vseries (Mean) | Expected economic value of the preferred tranche across all simulated scenarios | Use as the fair value for regulatory filings (Rule 11UA, IBBI) and investor reporting |
| Pref Exercise Rate | Percentage of scenarios where the investor takes the liquidation preference instead of converting | High rate (> 50%) signals significant downside protection value; the preference is "in the money" more often than not |
| 5th Percentile | Worst-case investor outcome (95% confidence floor) | In non-participating structures, this typically equals Lpref — proving the downside protection |
| 95th Percentile | Best-case investor outcome (upside potential) | Captures the "conversion premium" — how much the investor gains by converting to common in high-exit scenarios |
| Founder Residual | Average value available to founders/common holders | Critical for founder negotiations; reveals true dilution impact of preference terms |
| Vseries / Investment | Ratio of expected value to invested capital | Ratio > 1.0 indicates expected positive return; ratio < 1.0 signals the deal terms may not compensate for the risk taken |
Worked Example
Consider a Chennai-based B2B SaaS startup raising Series A. The term sheet specifies:
- Investment: ₹10 Crore for 20% equity on a post-money basis
- 1x Non-Participating Liquidation Preference (Lpref = ₹10 Cr)
- Expected exit in 5 years: ₹50 Crore (median estimate from comparable transactions)
- Exit volatility: σ = 0.4 (moderate uncertainty, typical for Indian SaaS)
- No senior venture debt (Ddebt = 0)
For a single simulated exit at ₹30 Crore:
For a single simulated exit at ₹80 Crore:
Running 10,000 such scenarios and averaging the results gives the Vseries — the true economic value of the Series A Preferred tranche, accounting for the full probability distribution of exits and the asymmetric payoff structure created by the liquidation preference.
When to Use V-SMC vs. Standard Methods
| Aspect | Standard DCF / Multiples | V-SMC Simulation |
|---|---|---|
| Valuation target | Entire enterprise value | Individual share class / tranche |
| Liquidation preferences | Ignored or qualitatively noted | Mathematically modeled via max() function |
| Anti-dilution | Not captured | Dynamic share count adjustment per path |
| Venture debt | Subtracted from EV (static) | Waterfall priority modeled per scenario |
| Exit uncertainty | Single-point estimate | Full probability distribution (N paths) |
| Founder vs Investor split | Simple percentage | State-dependent waterfall per scenario |
| Regulatory defensibility | Standard but incomplete for preferred | Quantitative, auditable, scenario-backed |
Regulatory Applications
The V-SMC framework produces valuations that are defensible in the following regulatory and commercial contexts:
- Section 56(2)(viib) / Rule 11UA (Angel Tax) — When justifying the fair market value of shares issued at a premium, the V-SMC demonstrates that the premium reflects the economic value of preference rights, not an inflated price. This is particularly relevant when different share classes trade at different prices.
- IBBI Valuations under IBC — In CIRP proceedings, different classes of creditors and shareholders have different priority claims. The V-SMC models the exact waterfall to value each class separately, producing defensible estimates for the Committee of Creditors.
- ESOP Exercise Price Determination — When ESOPs convert to common shares that sit below preferred shares in the liquidation waterfall, the V-SMC quantifies the "common stock discount" — the mathematically justified difference between preferred and common share values.
- FEMA Pricing for FDI Transactions — Cross-border investments often involve preference shares. FEMA pricing guidelines require fair valuation, and the V-SMC provides a rigorous methodology for valuing shares with complex rights attached.
- VC/PE Fund Reporting (Fair Value under Ind AS 113) — VC funds must report portfolio company holdings at fair value. The V-SMC provides a Level 3 fair value measurement using unobservable inputs with Monte Carlo simulation, consistent with Ind AS 113 requirements.
Need Term Sheet Valuation for Your Startup?
Get a professionally prepared valuation report using the V-SMC simulation framework. IBBI registered valuer with deep expertise in preferred equity valuation, liquidation waterfall analysis, and VC term sheet modeling under Indian regulatory requirements.